Search results
-
Full text
-
Document type
-
Organisation
Filter results
Results: 218,356
Number of items: 218,356
-
van Baak, C., Liebst, L., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2026). Limited Evidence that the Gender Composition of Public Conflicts is Associated with Bystander Intervention: A Video-Observational Study. Crime and Delinquency, 72(6-7), 1922–1950. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241298693 -
Amanatidis, G., Fusco, F., Lazos, P., Leonardi, S., Marchetti-Spaccamela, A., & Reiffenhäuser, R. (2026). Submodular maximization subject to a knapsack constraint: Combinatorial algorithms with near-optimal adaptive complexity. Theoretical Computer Science, 1060, Article 115629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2025.115629 -
Silvestri, S., Prokhorov, D., Vink, J., Ng, C.-Y., & IXPE (2026). Magnetic-field Order in the Southwestern Rim of RCW 86 Constrained Using X-Ray Polarimetry. Astrophysical Journal, 998(1), Article 172. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae3004 -
McCarthy, C., van Zandwijk, J. P., Worring, M., & Geradts, Z. (2026). Forensic activity classification using digital traces from iPhones: A machine learning-based approach. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 56(supplement), Article 302047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2026.302047 -
Liu, D., van Noorloos, F., Leung, M. W. H., & Bailey, A. (2026). Dynamic repertoires of resistance against Beijing’s heritage-led gentrification. Geoforum, 173, Article 104677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104677 -
Gill, T. D. (2026). The Role of the jus ad bellum in the international legal system and in the conduct of military operations. In P. A. L. Ducheine, T. D. Gill, P. B. M. J. Pijpers, & M. C. Zwanenburg (Eds.), A Research Agenda for Military Law (pp. 7-16). (Elgar Research Agendas). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035353507.00009 -
Bos, D. J. (2026). Home’s Best: Dutch Discourse on Care and Independent Living. In T. de Waal, & M. Hurenkamp (Eds.), Citizenship in Nativist Times (pp. 328-348). (NIAS Studies in Academic Freedom and Epistemic Diversity). Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.37866996.31
Page 98 of 21836