Commentary: Why treatment is the best choice for childhood mental disorders – a commentary on Roest et al. (2022)

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 03-2023
Journal Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Volume | Issue number 64 | 3
Pages (from-to) 470-473
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Research Institute of Child Development and Education (RICDE)
Abstract

An important question in mental healthcare for children is whether treatments are effective and safe in the long run. Here, we comment on a recent editorial perspective by Roest et al. (2022), who argue, based on an overview of systematic reviews, ‘that there is no convincing evidence that interventions for the most common childhood disorders are beneficial in the long term’. We believe that the available evidence does not justify this conclusion and express our concern regarding the harmful effects of their message. We show that there is evidence to suggest beneficial longer term treatment effects for each of the disorders and explain why evidence-based treatment should be offered to children with mental disorder

Document type Comment/Letter to the editor
Note Comment to: A.M. Roest, Y.A. de Vries, A.W. Wienen, P. de Jonge (2023) Editorial Perspective: Are treatments for childhood mental disorders helpful in the long run? An overview of systematic reviews. In: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol. 64, iss. 3, P. 464-469.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13715
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85141389328
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back