Search results

    Filter results

  • Full text

  • Document type

  • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 8
Number of items: 8
  • Open Access
    Mattingly, D., Incerti, T., Ju, C., Moreshead, C., Tanaka, S., & Yamagishi, H. (2025). Chinese State Media Persuades a Global Audience That the “China Model” is Superior: Evidence From A 19-Country Experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 69(3), 1029-1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12887
  • Mattingly, D., Incerti, T., Ju, C., Moreshead, C., Tanaka, S., & Yamagishi, H. (2024). Replication Data for: Chinese State Media Persuades a Global Audience That the "China Model" Is Superior: Evidence from a 19-Country Experiment [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/cq4fzr
  • Open Access
    Incerti, D., & Incerti, T. (2024). Are regime changes always bad economics? Evidence from daily financial data. Business and Politics, 26(4), 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2024.7
  • Open Access
    Carlson, J., Incerti, T., & Aronow, P. M. (2024). Dyadic clustering in international relations. Political Analysis, 32(2), 186-198. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2023.26
  • Open Access
    Incerti, T. (2024). Countering capture in local politics: Evidence from eight field experiments. The Journal of Politics, 86(4), 1603-1607. https://doi.org/10.1086/729949
  • Incerti, T. (2023). Countering capture in local politics: Evidence from eight field experiments [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/qwslyn
  • Carlson, J., Incerti, T., & Aronow, P. M. (2023). Replication Data for: Dyadic Clustering in International Relations [Data set]. Harvard Dataverse. https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/9i0lrq
  • Open Access
    Amano, K., Dominguez, M. S., Fraser, T., Gagnon, E., Incerti, T., Jang, J., McClean, C. T., Mitchell, A. M., Miyano, S., Moreshead, C., Saijo, H., Stanescu, D., Teraoka, A., Yamagishi, H., Willis, C. N., Woo, Y., & Crabtree, C. (2023). Field Research When There’s Limited Access to the Field: Lessons From Japan. PS, Political Science & Politics, 56(1), 99-105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096522000932
Page of