UvA DARE | Search results

UvA-DARE

Digital Academic Repository

UvA-DARE

Results: 142

Number of items: 142

Garssen, B. (2009). Comparing the incomparable: figurative analogies in a dialectical testing procedure. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Pondering on problems of argumentation: twenty essays on theoretical issues (pp. 133-140). (Argumentation library; No. 14). Springer.
Garssen, B., & van Laar, J. A. (2009). De pragma-dialectiek en de objectieve epistemische benadering van argumentatie. In W. Spooren, M. Onrust, & J. Sanders (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 3 (pp. 73-83). Van Gorcum.
Garssen, B. (2009). Ad hominem in disguise: strategic manoeuvring with direct personal attacks. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45(4), 207-213. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ufh&AN=47710427&site=ehost-live
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2009). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In J. Ritola (Ed.), Argument cultures: proceedings of OSSA '09 Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA8/papersandcommentaries/39/
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins.
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Preface. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. vii-viii). (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2008). Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 1-26). (Controversies; No. 6). Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2008). Reasonableness in confrontation: empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (pp. 181-195). (Controversies; No. 6). John Benjamins. http://books.google.nl/books?hl=nl&lr=&id=Rg4NjDGF6PEC&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=controversy+and+confrontation+eemeren&ots=xqUJremKTm&sig=DAe89qi5e6RHKcMkH80t7TKw_ck
Garssen, B. (2008). Seemingly unreasonable Ad hominem fallacies and legitimate personal attacks. In T. Suzuki, T. Kato, & A. Kubuta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation: argumentation, the law and justice (pp. 66-69). Japan Debate Association.
Garssen, B. (2008). Comments on ''Arguing 'for' the patient: Informed consent and strategic maneuvering in doctor-patient interaction". Argumentation, 22(3), 433-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-008-9085-z

Page 10 of 15