Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 518
Number of items: 518
  • van Eemeren, F. H. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in political discourse: a pragma-dialectical approach [introduction]. Controversia, 7(1), 11-15.
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2010). De uitgebreide pragma-dialectische argumentatietheorie empirisch geïnterpreteerd. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2010.1.DE_U370
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19-37.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In A. Capone (Ed.), Perspectives on language use and pragmatics: a volume in memory of Sorin Stati (pp. 35-50). (LINCOM studies in pragmatics; No. 16). Lincom Europa.
  • Snoeck Henkemans, F., van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2010). Profils dialectiques et indicateurs de 'coups' argumentatifs. Verbum, 32(1), 53-71.
  • Open Access
    Andone, C. (2010). Maneuvering strategically in a political interview: analyzing and evaluating responses to an accusation of inconsistency. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. SicSat.
  • Open Access
    van Eemeren, F. H., & Garssen, B. (2010). Constraints on political deliberation: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. In D. S. Gouran (Ed.), The functions of argument and social context: selected papers from the 16th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 505-514). National Communication Association. http://altaconference.org/contents/Alta16.html
  • Open Access
    Amjarso, B. (2010). Mentioning and then refuting an anticipated counterargument: a conceptual and empirical study of the persuasiveness of a mode of strategic manoeuvring. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. SicSat.
  • Open Access
    Lewiński, M. (2010). Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type: A pragma-dialectical analysis of online forms of strategic manoeuvring in reacting critically. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. Rozenberg Publishers.
  • van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules. (Argumentation library; No. 16). Springer.
Page 8 of 52