Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 77
Number of items: 77
  • Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2013). Institutionele waarborgen voor de aanvaardbaarheid van deskundigheidsargumentatie in medische discussies. In R. Boogaart, & H. Jansen (Eds.), Studies in taalbeheersing 4 (pp. 315-325). Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2013). [Review of: M. Spranzi (2011) The art of dialectic between dialogue and rhetoric: The Aristotelian tradition]. Argumentation, 27(1), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-012-9282-7
  • Wagemans, J. (2012). Commentaar bij Mireille Hildebrandt. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, J. A. Pontier, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Gewogen oordelen: essays over argumentatie en recht: bijdragen aan het Zesde Symposium Juridische Argumentatie 24 juni 2011 (pp. 357-360). Boom Juridische uitgevers.
  • Open Access
    Snoeck Henkemans, A. F., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2012). The reasonableness of argumentation from expert opinion in medical discussions: Institutional safeguards for the quality of shared decision making. In J. Goodwin (Ed.), Between scientists & citizens: proceedings of a conference at Iowa State University, June 1-2, 2012 (pp. 345-354). Great Plains Society for the Study of Argumentation.
  • Hitchcock, D., & Wagemans, J. (2011). The pragma-dialectical account of argument schemes. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 185-205). Benjamins.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Garssen, B., & Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The pragma-dialectical method of analysis. In R. C. Rowland (Ed.), Reasoned argument and social change: selected papers from the 17th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (pp. 25-47). National Communication Association.
  • Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). Argument schemes, topoi, and laws of logic. In F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1934-1939). Rozenberg/Sic Sat. http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/j.h.m.wagemans/bestanden/Chapter%20174%20Wagemans.pdf
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). [Review of: M.A. Finocchiaro (2010) Defending Copernicus and Galileo: critical reasoning in the two affairs]. Argumentation, 25(2), 271-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9204-0
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). The assessment of argumentation from expert opinion. Argumentation, 25(3), 329-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-011-9225-8
  • Open Access
    Wagemans, J. H. M. (2011). What's hot in... ...argumentation theory. The Reasoner, 5(4), 61. https://research.kent.ac.uk/reasoning/wp-content/uploads/sites/581/2019/06/TheReasoner-54.pdf
Page 7 of 8