Search results
Results: 408
Number of items: 408
-
Hoogeveen, S., Sarafoglou, A., van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Many-analysts religion project: reflection and conclusion. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 13(3), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070263 -
van den Bergh, D., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Aust, F. (2023). Bayesian Repeated-Measures Analysis of Variance: An Updated Methodology Implemented in JASP. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231168024 -
Hoogeveen, S., Berkhout, S. W., Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Haaf, J. M. (2023). Improving Statistical Analysis in Team Science: The Case of a Bayesian Multiverse of Many Labs 4. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459231182318 -
Hardwicke, T. E., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01497-2 -
Sarafoglou, A., Hoogeveen, S., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2023). Comparing Analysis Blinding With Preregistration in the Many-Analysts Religion Project. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221128319 -
Sarafoglou, A., Haaf, J. M., Ly, A., Gronau, Q. F., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Marsman, M. (2023). Evaluating Multinomial Order Restrictions With Bridge Sampling. Psychological Methods, 28(2), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000411 -
Stefan, A. M., Evans, N. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). Practical Challenges and Methodological Flexibility in Prior Elicitation. Psychological Methods, 27(2), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d42xb, https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000354
-
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Sarafoglou, A., & Aczel, B. (2022). One statistical analysis must not rule them all. Nature, 605(7910), 423-425. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01332-8
-
van Ravenzwaaij, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2022). Advantages Masquerading as “Issues” in Bayesian Hypothesis Testing: A Commentary on Tendeiro and Kiers (2019). Psychological Methods, 27(3), 451-465. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000415
Page 7 of 41