Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 147
Number of items: 147
  • Feteris, E. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with linguistic arguments in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. van Haaften, H. Jansen, J. de Jong, & W. Koetsenruijter (Eds.), Bending opinion: essays on persuasion in the public domain (pp. 423-439). Leiden University Press.
  • Feteris, E., Groarke, L., & Plug, J. (2011). Strategic maneuvering with visual arguments in political cartoons: a pragma-dialectical analysis of the use of topoi that are based on common cultural heritage. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 59-74). John Benjamins.
  • Feteris, E., & Kloosterhuis, H. (2011). Law and argumentation theory: theoretical approaches to legal justification. In B. van Klink, & S. Taekema (Eds.), Law and method: interdisciplinary research into law (pp. 253-273). (Politika; No. 4). Mohr Siebeck.
  • Feteris, E., Garssen, B., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren. John Benjamins.
  • Feteris, E., Garssen, B., & Snoeck Henkemans, F. (2011). Introduction. In E. Feteris, B. Garssen, & F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Keeping in touch with pragma-dialectics: in honor of Frans H. van Eemeren (pp. 1-4). John Benjamins.
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. T. (2011). Strategic Manoeuvring in the Case of the ‘Unworthy Spouse’. In F. H. Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, & G. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 448-460). Rosenberg/Sic Sat.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2010). De hoge raad kiest de veilige weg: een pragma-dialectische analyse van het strategisch manoeuvreren in de zaak van de onwaardige deelgenoot. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5117/TVT2010.1.DE_H368
  • Feteris, E. T. (2010). The allocation of the burden of proof in mixed disputes in legal and non-legal contexts. Cogency, 2(1), 35-55. http://www.cogency.udp.cl/ediciones/3/Cogency_v2_n1.pdf
  • Open Access
    Amjarso, B. (2010). Mentioning and then refuting an anticipated counterargument: a conceptual and empirical study of the persuasiveness of a mode of strategic manoeuvring. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam]. SicSat.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2009). Inleiding: [themanummer over taalkundige argumentatie]. Rechtsgeleerd Magazijn Themis, 2009(2), 59-60. http://www.uitgeverijparis.nl/online/pdf/paris-rmth20090401.02.02.pdf
Page 5 of 15