Search results

    Filter results

  • Full text

  • Document type

  • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 143
Number of items: 143
  • Open Access
    Zhao, W., Jin, Y., van der Meer, T., Hameleers, M., & Lu, X. (2025). Beyond a fragmented account of conflicts in communication: a framework of informational conflicts. Annals of the International Communication Association, 49(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlae003
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2025). The nature of visual disinformation online: A aualitative content analysis of alternative and social media in the Netherlands. Political Communication, 42(1), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2024.2354389
  • Open Access
    van der Goot, E. S., Hameleers, M., & de Ridder, J. (2025). Political conflict frames. In S. A. Samoilenko, & S. Simmons (Eds.), The Handbook of Social and Political Conflict (pp. 211-220). (Handbooks in communication and media). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119895534.ch19
  • Open Access
    van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Hameleers, M. (2025). Perceptions of misinformation salience: a cross-country comparison of estimations of misinformation prevalence and third-person perceptions. Information, Communication & Society, 28(4), 575-596. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2024.2375256
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M., & van der Meer, T. (2025). The Implications of Epistemic Polarization and Factual Relativism for Misinformation Research and Democracy. Political Communication, 42(5), 917-923. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2025.2514595
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2024). Why Do Social Media Users Accept, Doubt or Resist Corrective Information? A Qualitative Analysis of Comments in Response to Corrective Information on Social Media. Journalism Studies, 25(7), 776-793. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2024.2340591
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2024). Is the alarm on deception ringing too loudly? The effects of different forms of misinformation warnings on risk perceptions of misinformation exposure. European Journal of Communication, 39(4), 360-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241271015
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2024). This is Clearly Fake! Mis- and Disinformation Beliefs and the (Accurate) Recognition of Pseudo-Information – Evidence from the US and the Netherlands. American Behavioral Scientist, 68(10), 1249-1268. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231174334
  • Open Access
    Gehle, L., Hameleers, M., Tulin, M., de Vreese, C., Aalberg, T., Van Aelst, P., Cardenal, A. S., Corbu, N., van Erkel, P., Esser, F., Halagiera, D., Hopmann, D., Koç-Michalska, K., Matthes, J., Meltzer, C., Splendore, S., Stanyer, J., Stępińska, A., Štětka, V., ... Zoizner, A. (2024). Misinformation Detection in the Context of the Russian Invasion of Ukraine: Evidence From Original Survey Data collected in 19 Democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 36(3), Article edad040. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edad040
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Dobber, T. (2024). They would never say anything like this! Reasons to doubt political deepfakes. European Journal of Communication, 39(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231184703
Page 4 of 15