Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 56
Number of items: 56
  • Open Access
    Downey, H., Bretagnolle, V., Brick, C., Bulman, C. R., Cooke, S. J., Dean, M., Edmonds, B., Frick, W. F., Friedman, K., McNicol, C., Nichols, C., Herbert, S., O’Brien, D., Ockendon, N., Petrovan, S., Stroud, D., White, T. B., Worthington, T. A., & Sutherland, W. J. (2022). Principles for the production of evidence-based guidance for conservation actions. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(5), Article e12663. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12663
  • Open Access
    Sparks, A. C., Ehret, P. J., & Brick, C. (2022). Measuring pro-environmental orientation: Testing and building scales. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, Article 101780. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ptjkr, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101780
  • Open Access
    Castiglione, A., Brick, C., Holden, S., Miles-Urdan, E., & Aron, A. R. (2022). Discovering the psychological building blocks underlying climate action—a longitudinal study of real-world activism. Royal Society Open Science, 9(6), Article 210006. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210006
  • Open Access
    Kácha, O., Vintr, J., & Brick, C. (2022). Four Europes: Climate change beliefs and attitudes predict behavior and policy preferences using a latent class analysis on 23 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 81, Article 101815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101815
  • Open Access
    Brick, C., Hood, B., Ekroll, V., & de-Wit, L. (2022). Illusory Essences: A Bias Holding Back Theorizing in Psychological Science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 491-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691621991838
  • Open Access
    Nielsen, K. S., Brick, C., Hofmann, W., Joanes, T., Lange, F., & Gwozdz, W. (2022). The motivation–impact gap in pro-environmental clothing consumption. Nature Sustainability, 5, 665-668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00888-7
  • Lange, F., Nielsen, K. S., Cologna, V., Brick, C., & Stern, P. C. (2021). Making theory useful for understanding high-impact behavior. A response to van Valkengoed et al. (2021). Journal of Environmental Psychology, 75, Article 101611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101611
  • Nielsen, K. S., Cologna, V., Lange, F., Brick, C., & Stern, P. C. (2021). The case for impact-focused environmental psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, Article 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101559
  • Open Access
    Geiger, S. J., Brick, C., Nalborczyk, L., Bosshard, A., & Jostmann, N. B. (2021). More green than gray? Toward a sustainable overview of environmental spillover effects: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78, Article 101694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101694
  • Open Access
    Zwicker, M. V., Brick, C., Gruter, G.-JM., & van Harreveld, F. (2021). (Not) Doing the Right Things for the Wrong Reasons: An Investigation of Consumer Attitudes, Perceptions, and Willingness to Pay for Bio-Based Plastics. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(12), Article 6819. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126819
Page 4 of 6