Search results
Results: 68
Number of items: 68
-
Hoogeveen, S., Schjoedt, U., & van Elk, M. (2018). Did I do that? Expectancy effects of brain stimulation on error-related negativity and sense of agency. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(11), 1720-1733. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01297 -
Hoogeveen, S., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Kay, A. C., & Van Elk, M. (2018). Compensatory control and religious beliefs: A registered replication report across two countries. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 3(3), 240-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2019.1684821
-
van Elk, M., & Lodder, P. (2018). Experimental manipulations of control do not increase illusory pattern perception. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.155
-
van Elk, M. (2017). The self-attribution bias and paranormal beliefs. Consciousness and Cognition, 49, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.02.001
-
Specker, E., Tinio, P. P. L., & van Elk, M. (2017). Do You See What I See? An Investigation of the Aesthetic Experience in the Laboratory and Museum. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(3), 265-275. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000107
-
van Elk, M., Duizer, M., Sligte, I., & van Schie, H. (2017). Transcranial direct current stimulation of the right temporoparietal junction impairs third-person perspective taking. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 17(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0462-z
-
van Elk, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2017). Can the experimental study of religion be advanced using a Bayesian predictive framework? Religion, Brain & Behavior, 7(4), 331-334. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1249915
-
Maij, D. L. R., van Harreveld, F., Gervais, W., Schragg, Y., Mohr, C., & van Elk, M. (2017). Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers, but credibility enhancing displays do. PLoS ONE, 12(8), Article e0182764. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182764
Page 4 of 7