Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 91
Number of items: 91
  • Open Access
    Gabriel, M., Horn, C., Katsman, A., Krull, W., Lippold, A. L., Pelluchon, C., & Venzke, I. (2022). Towards a New Enlightenment – The Case for Future-Oriented Humanities. (The New Institute.Interventions; Vol. 1). transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839465707
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I., & Günther, P. (2022). Völkerrechtlicher Investitionsschutz made in Germany? Zur Genese und Gestalt des ersten BIT zwischen Deutschland und Pakistan (1959). Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 81(1), 73-120. https://doi.org/10.17104/0044-2348-2022-1-73
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I., & Vidigal, G. (2022). Are Unilateral Trade Measures in the Climate Crisis the End of Differentiated Responsibilities? The Case of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). In M. den Heijer, & H. van der Wilt (Eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2020: Global Solidarity and Common but Differentiated Responsibilities (pp. 187-225). (Netherlands Yearbook of International Law; Vol. 51). Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-527-0_7
  • Venzke, I., & Heller, K. J. (Eds.) (2021). Contingency in International Law: on the possibility of different legal histories. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898036.001.0001
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I. (2021). From Charity to Justice in the Pandemic: Why Germany Should Support Waiving Intellectual Property Rights. Web publication or website, Verfassungsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20211031-172730-0
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I. (2021). How Could International Law Have Been Otherwise? A Rejoinder. Web publication or website, Völkerrechtsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20210618-192844-0
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I. (2021). Why Use the Language of the Law in Global Politics? On the Legitimacy Effects of Claiming to Act Legally. In I. Johnstone, & S. Ratner (Eds.), Talking International Law: Legal Argumentation Outside the Courtroom (pp. 25-41). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197588437.003.0002
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I. (2021). Situating Contingency in the Path of International Law. In I. Venzke, & K. J. Heller (Eds.), Contingency in International Law: on the possibility of different legal histories (pp. 3-19). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898036.003.0001
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I. (2021). The Law of the Global Economy and the Spectre of Inequality. London Review of International Law, 9(1), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrab005
  • Open Access
    Venzke, I. (2021). Cognitive Biases and International Law: What’s the Point of Critique? In A. Bianchi, & M. Hirsch (Eds.), International Law’s Invisible Frames: Social Cognition and Knowledge Production in International Legal Processes (pp. 55-71). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192847539.003.0004
Page 3 of 10