Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 147
Number of items: 147
  • Feteris, E., Kloosterhuis, H., Plug, H. J., & Smith, C. (2016). Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law. In E. T. Feteris, H. Kloosterhuis, H. J. Plug, & C. E. Smith (Eds.), Legal Argumentation and the Rule of Law (pp. 1-16). Eleven international publishing.
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. T. (2016). Prototypical argumentative patterns in a legal context: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. Argumentation, 30(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9376-0
  • Feteris, E. T. (2015). A pragma-dialectical approach of legal argumentation: The role of pragmatic argumentation in the justification of judicial decisions. In F. H. van Eemeren, & B. Garssen (Eds.), Scrutinizing argumentation in practice (pp. 199-120). (Argumentation in context; No. 9). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.9.06fet
  • Feteris, E. T. (2015). Argumentation from reasonableness in the justification of judicial decisions. In T. Bustamante, & C. Dahlman (Eds.), Argument Types and Fallacies in Legal Argumentation (pp. 179-201). (Law and Philosophy Library; No. 112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16148-8_11
  • Feteris, E. T. (2015). Strategic manoeuvring in the case of the 'Unworthy Spouse'. In M. Manzin, F. Puppo, & S. Tomasi (Eds.), Studies on argumentation and legal philosophy: Further steps towards a pluralistic approach (pp. 33-50). (Quaderni della Facoltà di Giurisprudenza dell'Università degli Studi di Trento; Vol. 10). Editoriale Scientifica.
  • Open Access
    Feteris, E. T. (2015). The role of pragmatic argumentation referring to consequences, goals, and values in the justification of judicial decisions. In B. J. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), International Society for the Study of Argumentation: 8th International Conference on Argumentation: July 1-July 4, 2014, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 414-425). Sic Sat.
  • Dahlman, C., & Feteris, E. (2013). Legal argumentation theory: cross-disciplinary perspectives. (Law and philosophy library; No. 102). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1
  • Feteris, E. (2013). The use of allusions to literary and cultural sources in argumentation in political cartoons. In H. van Belle, P. Gillaerts, B. van Gorp, D. van de Mieroop, & K. Rutten (Eds.), Verbal and visual rhetoric in a media world (pp. 415-428). (Rhetoric in Society). Leiden University Press.
  • Feteris, E. T. (2013). Strategic maneuvering with the argumentative role of legal principles in the case of the ‘Unworthy Spouse’. Law and Philosophy Library, 102, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4670-1_6
  • Open Access
    van Poppel, L. (2013). Getting the vaccine now will protect you in the future! A pragma-dialectical analysis of strategic maneuvering with pragmatic argumentation in health brochures. [Thesis, fully internal, Universiteit van Amsterdam].
Page 3 of 15