Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 133
Number of items: 133
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Argumentation and reasonabless. Maintaining a delicate balance in strategic manoeuvring. Argumentation, Interpretation, Rhetoric.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Preface special issue 'Perspectives on strategic maneuvering'. Argumentation, 20, 377-380.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Manobriando estratégicamente: Manteniendo un delicado balance. In C. Santibánez Yánez, & B. Riffo Ocares (Eds.), Estudios en argumentación y retórica. Teorías contemporáneas y aplicaciones (pp. 83-121). Editorial Universidad de Concepcion.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. In H. V. Hansen, C. W. Tindale, J. A. Blair, R. H. Johnson, & D. M. Godden (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground: OSSA 2007 Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation. http://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA7/papersandcommentaries/37/
  • Amjarso, B., Houtlosser, P., & Lewinski, M. (2007). Bibliography argumentation studies 2003. Argumentation, 21(2), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-007-9048-9
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). Reconnecting dialectic and rhetoric: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Anthropology & Philosophy, 8(1-2), 49-67. http://www.aetp.it/IndiciVolumi/Anthropology8-2007.pdf
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2007). A procedural view of critical reasonableness. In T. Dubrovskaya, M. Kuczyński, & O. Abrahamova (Eds.), Modern Developments in Linguistics and Language Teaching: international conference proceedings (pp. 77-85). International Independent University of Ecology and Political Science.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., Houtlosser, P., & Snoeck Henkemans, A. F. (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse: a pragma-dialectical study. (Argumentation library; No. 12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6244-5
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2006). Strategisch manoeuvreren, het model van een kritische discussie en conventionele actietypen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(1), 1-14.
  • van Eemeren, F. H., & Houtlosser, P. (2006). Complementary dialectical and rhetorical considerations. An analysis of a burden of proof manipulation. In F. H. Eemeren, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Argumentation: Views from the Venice Argumentation Conference. (pp. 37-46). Sic Sat.
Page 3 of 14