Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 144
Number of items: 144
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2020). Populist disinformation: Exploring intersections between online populism and disinformation in the US and the Netherlands. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.2478
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2020). We Are Right, They Are Wrong: The Antagonistic Relationship Between Populism and Discourses of (Un)truthfulness. DisClosure: A journal of Social Theory, 29(1), 104-120. Article 12. https://doi.org/10.13023/disclosure.29.11
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2020). Gescheiden mediawerelden, gepolariseerde interpretaties? Een kwalitatieve analyse van online nieuwsberichten en reactiesecties in Nederland, de VS en het VK. Mens en Maatschappij, 95(1), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.5117/MEM2020.1.004.INDE
  • Open Access
    Boukes, M., & Hameleers, M. (2020). Shattering populists’ rhetoric with satire at elections times: The effect of humorously holding populists accountable for their lack of solutions. Journal of Communication, 70(4), 574-597. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa020
  • Hameleers, M., Reinemann, C., Schmuck, D., & Fawzi, N. (2019). The persuasiveness of populist communication: Conceptualizing the effects and political consequences of populist communication from a social identity perspective. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 143-167). (Routledge Studies in Media, Communication, and Politics). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402067-8
  • Hameleers, M. (2019). They Caused our Crisis! The Contents and Effects of Populist Communication: Evidence from the Netherlands. In O. Feldman, & S. Zmerli (Eds.), The Psychology of Political Communicators: How Politicians, Culture, and the Media Construct and Shape Public Discourse (pp. 79-98). (Routledge Studies in Political Psychology; Vol. 6). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429487897-5
  • Möller, J., & Hameleers, M. (2019). Different Types of Disinformation, its Political Consequences and Treatment Recommendations for Media Policy and Practice. ASCoR. https://www.medienanstalt-nrw.de/fileadmin/user_upload/NeueWebsite_0120/Themen/Desinformation/WasIstDesinformation_Peper_LFMNRW.pdf
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2019). Susceptibility to mis- and disinformation and the effectiveness of fact-checkers: Can misinformation be effectively combated? Studies in Communication I Media (SCM), 8(4), 523-546. https://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2019-4-523
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M., Andreadis, I., & Reinemann, C. (2019). Investigating the effects of populist communication: Design and measurement of the comparative experimental study. In C. Reinemann, J. Stanyer, T. Aalberg, F. Esser, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Communicating populism: Comparing actor perceptions, media coverage, and effects on citizens in Europe (pp. 168-182). (Routledge Studies in Media, Communication, and Politics). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429402067-9
  • Open Access
    Hameleers, M. (2019). To like is to support? The effects and mechanisms of selective exposure to online populist communication on voting preferences. International Journal of Communication : IJoC, 13, 2417–2436. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/10598/2668
Page 13 of 15