Search results

  • Full text

  • Document type

    • Publication year

  • Organisation

Results: 412
Number of items: 412
  • Manning, C., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Norcia, A. M., Scerif, G., & Boehm, U. (2020). Modelling files supporting the published article: Perceptual decision-making in children: Age-related differences and EEG correlates [Data set]. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11931714
  • Open Access
    Evans, N. J., Dutilh, G., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Maas, H. L. J. V. D. (2020). Double responding: A new constraint for models of speeded decision making. Cognitive Psychology, 121, Article 101292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2020.101292
  • Open Access
    Boehm, U., van Maanen, L., Evans, N. J., Brown, S. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). A theoretical analysis of the reward rate optimality of collapsing decision criteria. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82(3), 1520-1534. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01806-4
  • Open Access
    Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2020). The Principle of Predictive Irrelevance, or Why Intervals Should Not be Used for Model Comparison Featuring a Point Null Hypothesis. In C. W. Gruber (Ed.), The Theory of Statistics in Psychology: Applications, Use and Misunderstandings (pp. 111-129). (Annals of Theoretical Psychology; Vol. 16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/rqnu5, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48043-1_8
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Statistical dark arts endanger democracy — and life: Two scourges of the infodemic show how to spot quantitative chicanery. [Review of: C.T. Bergstrom, J.D. West (2020) Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data‑Driven World]. Nature, 584(7819), 36. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-02280-x
  • Open Access
    Field, S. M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Kiers, H. A. L., Hoekstra, R., Ernst, A. F., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report. Royal Society Open Science, 7(4), Article 181351. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.181351
  • Open Access
    van Doorn, J., Matzke, D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). An In-Class Demonstration of Bayesian Inference. Psychology Learning and Teaching, 19(1), 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725719848574
  • Open Access
    Aczel, B., Szaszi, B., Sarafoglou, A., Kekecs, Z., Kucharský, Š., Benjamin, D., Chambers, C. D., Fisher, A., Gelman, A., Gernsbacher, M. A., Ioannidis, J. P., Johnson, E., Jonas, K., Kousta, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., Lindsay, D. S., Morey, C. C., Munafò, M., Newell, B. R., ... Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 4-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
  • Open Access
    van Doorn, J., Ly, A., Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2020). Bayesian rank-based hypothesis testing for the rank sum test, the signed rank test, and Spearman’s ρ. Journal of Applied Statistics, 47(16), 2984-3006. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2019.1709053
  • Aczel, B., Hoekstra, R., Gelman, A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Klugkist, I. G., Rouder, J. N., Vandekerckhove, J., Lee, M. D., Morey, R. D., Vanpaemel, W., Dienes, Z., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2020). Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(6), 561–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z
Page 13 of 42