Search results
Results: 16
Number of items: 16
-
Hamilton, T. (2022). Defending Ukraine with EU weapons: arms control law in times of crisis. European Law Open, 1(3), 635-659. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.35 -
Sluiter, G., & Hamilton, T. (2022). Why the ICC’s termination of proceedings against deceased Kenyan defendant Paul Gicheru should not be the end of the matter. Web publication or website, EJIL: Talk!. https://www.ejiltalk.org/why-the-iccs-termination-of-proceedings-against-deceased-kenyan-defendant-paul-gicheru-should-not-be-the-end-of-the-matter/
-
Hamilton, T., & Sluiter, G. (2022). Principles of reparations at the International Criminal Court: assessing alternative approaches. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 25, 272-317. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4042098, https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413_02501018
-
Hamilton, T., & Tiernan, M. (2022). Who could be held responsible for ecocide under the Rome Statute?. Web publication or website, Rethinking SLIC. https://rethinkingslic.org/blog/criminal-law/115-who-could-be-held-responsible-for-ecocide-under-the-rome-statute
-
Hamilton, T., & Caon, G. (2021). Corporate complicity in Myanmar: beyond Facebook. Web publication or website, Rethinking SLIC. https://rethinkingslic.org/blog/criminal-law/104-corporate-complicity-in-myanmar-beyond-facebook
-
Hamilton, T. (2021). An arms trade case at the International Criminal Court: Would the Article 25(3)(c) ‘purpose’ requirement really matter?. Web publication or website, Rethinking SLIC. https://rethinkingslic.org/blog/criminal-law/93-an-arms-trade-case-at-the-international-criminal-court-would-the-article-25-3-c-purpose-requirement-really-matter
Page 2 of 2