Development of a Novel Methodology for Ascertaining Scientific Opinion and Extent of Agreement

Open Access
Authors
  • P. Vickers
  • L. Adamo
  • M. Alfano
  • C. Clark
  • E. Cresto
  • H. Cui
  • H. Dang
  • F. Dellsén
  • N. Dupin
  • L. Gradowski
  • S. Graf
  • A. Guevara
  • M. Hallap
  • J. Hamilton
  • M. Hardey
  • P. Helm ORCID logo
  • A. Landrum
  • N. Levy
  • E. Machery
  • S. Mills
  • S. Muller
  • J. Sheppard
  • N.K. Shinod
  • M. Slater
  • J. Stegenga
  • H. Strandin
  • M.T. Stuart
  • D. Sweet
  • U. Tasdan
  • H. Taylor
  • O. Towler
  • D. Tulodziecki
  • H. Tworek
  • R. Wallbank
  • H. Wiltsche
  • S.M. Finnigan
Publication date 06-12-2024
Journal PLoS ONE
Article number e0313541
Volume | Issue number 19 | 12
Number of pages 24
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA)
Abstract
We take up the challenge of developing an international network with capacity to survey the world’s scientists on an ongoing basis, providing rich datasets regarding the opinions of scientists and scientific sub-communities, both at a time and also over time. The novel methodology employed sees local coordinators, at each institution in the network, sending survey invitation emails internally to scientists at their home institution. The emails link to a ‘10 second survey’, where the participant is presented with a single statement to consider, and a standard five-point Likert scale. In June 2023, a group of 30 philosophers and social scientists invited 20,085 scientists across 30 institutions in 12 countries to participate, gathering 6,807 responses to the statement Science has put it beyond reasonable doubt that COVID-19 is caused by a virus. The study demonstrates that it is possible to establish a global network to quickly ascertain scientific opinion on a large international scale, with high response rate, low opt-out rate, and in a way that allows for significant (perhaps indefinite) repeatability. Measuring scientific opinion in this new way would be a valuable complement to currently available approaches, potentially informing policy decisions and public understanding across diverse fields.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313541
Downloads
journal.pone.0313541 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back