Euroscepticism and the use of negative, uncivil and emotional campaigns in the 2019 European Parliament election: A winning combination

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 03-2022
Journal European Union Politics
Volume | Issue number 23 | 1
Pages (from-to) 21-42
Number of pages 22
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR)
Abstract
Are Eurosceptic parties more likely to run negative, uncivil and emotional campaigns, as it is often intuitively argued? And with what consequences? In this article, we shed light on the effectiveness of these campaign strategies for Eurosceptic parties during the 2019 European elections. We argue that ‘harsher’ campaigns are ‘in character’ for Eurosceptic parties, and are as such more likely to be electorally successful for them. We use data from the 2019 European Parliament Elections Expert Survey, covering 191 unique parties, and show that, indeed, Eurosceptic parties are more likely to campaign in a harsh way, and more likely than Europhile parties to benefit electorally from it. All data and materials are openly available for replication.
Document type Article
Note With supplementary files
Language English
Related dataset sj-do-2-eup-10.1177_14651165211035675 - Supplemental material for Euroscepticism and the use of negative, uncivil and emotional campaigns in the 2019 European Parliament election: A winning combination sj-xlsx-3-eup-10.1177_14651165211035675 - Supplemental material for Euroscepticism and the use of negative, uncivil and emotional campaigns in the 2019 European Parliament election: A winning combination
Published at https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211035675
Downloads
14651165211035675 (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back