The exceptional loss of the pronoun T
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 10-2015 |
| Journal | Journal of Pragmatics |
| Volume | Issue number | 88 |
| Pages (from-to) | 190-201 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Calculations on lexical stability show that the V-pronoun is variable but the T-pronoun is stable across language families (cf. Swadesh, 2006, Wichmann and Holman, 2009 and Tadmor et al., 2010). In fact, the T-pronoun is in the top 10 of basic vocabulary items. Nevertheless, both English and Dutch have lost their T-pronoun. We suggest that this unexpected loss of T in English and Dutch can be explained via an exceptional combination of circumstances, namely (1) a focus on negative politeness, (2) the possibility of deflection via the loss of the T-pronoun and (3) pressure on the inflectional system due to language contact involving adult second language learners. These factors lead to two predictions: one related to the subject-non-subject ratio, and one related to text style. We test both predictions in a corpus of 13th and 16th century texts.
Keywords Address terms; Inflection; Text style; Language contact; Language change |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.07.003 |
| Downloads |
1-s2.0-S0378216615002088-main
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
