The Betrayal of Anne Frank: A Refutation Critical Analysis of the Argumentation and Use of Historical Sources

Open Access
Authors
  • B. Wallet ORCID logo
  • P. van den Boomgaard
  • B. van der Boom
  • R. Schütz
Publication date 03-2022
Number of pages 69
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam School of Historical Studies (ASH)
Abstract
After a well-orchestrated media campaign subject to strict embargo rules, a controversial book was launched on 17 January 2022: The Betrayal of Anne Frank: A Cold Case Investigation. The Cold Case Team (hereafter: CCT) went public with the news that it could identify - with a very high probability, precisely quantified at 85 to 87% - the traitor responsible for the raid on the Secret Annex: Arnold van den Bergh. This report reconstructs Van den Bergh ‘s life based on the available historical sources and tests the views of the CCT on the basis of this information, whereby we conclude that the accusations levelled against him are unjustified. We demonstrate the problematic nature of the CCT's approach to historical sources, the scanty nature of historical knowledge about the period from 1930 to 1950, and how this leads to a series of unjustified inferences being made in the case of Van den Bergh.
Document type Report
Language English
Downloads
Refutation_ENG_PDF (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back