Why do private governance organizations not converge? A political-institutional analysis of transnational labor standards regulation

Authors
Publication date 2011
Journal Governance: an international journal of policy, administration and institutions
Volume | Issue number 24 | 2
Pages (from-to) 359-387
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract
Voluntary governance arrangements focusing on responsible business behavior have proliferated over the past decades, and in many sectors of industry, different governance organizations now compete for business participation. This private governance competition has negative consequences for the effective functioning of these arrangements. In the literature up until now, optimism prevails on how a process of policy convergence between organizations may come about that would solve some of the problems that arise because of this competition. It is remarkable, however, that in one of the key industries referred to in this literature, the garments industry, convergence is virtually absent. This article explains why this is so and suggests that next to three existing approaches to the evolution and possible convergence of private governance organizations, actually a fourth, pessimistic type should be introduced, taking into account the evolution and perseverance of political difference between interest groups creating and supporting private governance arrangements.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01519.x
Permalink to this page
Back