New bounds on the classical and quantum communication complexity of some graph properties

Open Access
Authors
  • G. Ivanyos
  • H. Klauck
  • T. Lee
  • M. Santha
Publication date 12-2012
Host editors
  • D. D'Souza
  • T. Kavitha
  • J. Radhakrishnan
Book title IARCS Annual Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science
Book subtitle FSTTCS 2012, December 15-17, 2012 Hyderabad, India
ISBN (electronic)
  • 9783939897477
Series Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics
Event 32nd International Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science
Pages (from-to) 148-159
Publisher Saarbrücken/Wadern: Schloss Dagstuhl - Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik
Organisations
  • Interfacultary Research - Institute for Logic, Language and Computation (ILLC)
Abstract
We study the communication complexity of a number of graph properties where the edges of the graph G are distributed between Alice and Bob (i.e., each receives some of the edges as input). Our main results are: 1. An Omega(n) lower bound on the quantum communication complexity of deciding whether an n-vertex graph G is connected, nearly matching the trivial classical upper bound of O(n log n) bits of communication. 2. A deterministic upper bound of O(n^{3/2} log n) bits for deciding if a bipartite graph contains a perfect matching, and a quantum lower bound of Omega(n) for this problem. 3. A Theta(n^2) bound for the randomized communication complexity of deciding if a graph has an Eulerian tour, and a Theta(n^{3/2}) bound for its quantum communication complexity. 4. The first two quantum lower bounds are obtained by exhibiting a reduction from the n-bit Inner Product problem to these graph problems, which solves an open question of Babai, Frankl and Simon [Babai et al 1986]. The third quantum lower bound comes from recent results about the quantum communication complexity of composed functions. We also obtain essentially tight bounds for the quantum communication complexity of a few other problems, such as deciding if $G$ is triangle-free, or if G is bipartite, as well as computing the determinant of a distributed matrix.
Document type Conference contribution
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2012.148
Other links https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/portals/lipics/index.php?semnr=12014
Downloads
12 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back