Aggregating economic capital
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2005 |
| Journal | Belgian Actuarial Bulletin |
| Volume | Issue number | 5 | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 14-25 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In this paper we analyze and evaluate a standard approach financial institutions use to calculate their so-called total economic capital. If we consider a business that faces a total random loss S over a given one-year horizon then economic capital is traditionally defined as the difference between 99.97% percentile of S and its expectation. The standard approach essentially assumes that the different components (risks) of S are multivariate normally distributed and this highly facilitates the computation of the total aggregated economic capital. In this paper we show that this approach also holds for a more general framework which encompasses as a special case the multivariate normal (and elliptical) setting. We question also the assumption of multivariate normality since for many risks one often assumes other than normal distributions (e.g. a lognormal distribution for insurqnce risk). Assuming that risks are either normal or lognormal distributed we propose, using the concept of comonotonicity, an alternative aggregation approach.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | http://www.belgianactuarialbulletin.be/articles/vol05/04-Dhaene.pdf |
| Permalink to this page | |