After the celebration: Marriage equality in EU Law post-Coman in eight questions and some further thoughts

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 10-2020
Journal Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law
Volume | Issue number 27 | 5
Pages (from-to) 549-572
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR)
Abstract
This paper provides a detailed critical analysis of the case of Coman, where the Court of Justice clarified that the meaning of the term ‘spouse’ in Directive 2004/38 was gender-neutral, opening up the door for same-sex marriage recognition for immigration purposes all around the EU, thus destroying the heteronormative misinterpretations of the clear language of the Directive practised in a handful of Member States. The state of EU law after Coman is still far from perfect, however: we underline a line of important questions which remain open and which the Court will need to turn to in the near future to ensure that marriage equality moves beyond mere proclamations in the whole territory of the Union.
Document type Article
Note With rgard to: Case C-673/16 Coman et al. v. Inspectoratul General pentru Imigrări, EU:C:2018:385.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X20962749
Downloads
1023263x20962749 (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back