Two Takes on Chagos: Reconciling the Advisory Opinion with the Res Judicata Effect of the UNCLOS Arbitral Award
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2021 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | The International Court of Justice and Decolonisation |
| Book subtitle | New Directions from the Chagos Advisory Opinion |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Pages (from-to) | 71-94 |
| Publisher | Cambridge: Cambridge University Press |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Before the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued its Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965,
an arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations
Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) had already ruled on closely
related questions. Even though the UNCLOS
tribunal had declined jurisdiction over the ‘sovereignty dispute’, the
tribunal made several determinations of potential relevance to the
proceedings before the ICJ, notably on the international legal status of
the 1965 agreement between Mauritius and the UK.
|
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108893770.005 |
| Permalink to this page | |