Contesting the Musical Ear Hermann von Helmholtz, Gottfried Weber and Carl Stumpf Analyzing Mozart
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2025 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Traditions of Analysis and Synthesis |
| ISBN |
|
| ISBN (electronic) |
|
| Series | Archimedes: New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology |
| Chapter | 15 |
| Pages (from-to) | 379-402 |
| Publisher | Cham: Springer |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Music analysis emerged in the late nineteenth century as an occupation
in its own right, independent from the education of composers. This chapter uses three case studies to describe how and with what aims three authors, in analyzing music by Mozart, produced samples to which to compare his music. It thereby traces how a pairing of the notions of analysis and composition increasingly created room for a concept of synthesis that eventually replaced the notion of the “fine ear” for music with procedures devised by the analyst that take into account a genuine malleability of hearing and listening. The cases are Hermann von Helmholtz’s charts for indicating the harmoniousness of its component chords in Mozart’s Ave verum corpus, K. 618; Gottfried Weber’s fabricated alternatives to the famous dis- sonances opening the string quartet C major, K. 465; and, finally, Carl Stumpf’s comments on his listening of the Serenade B-flat major, K. 361, after having exten- sively used the first technical analysis and synthesis of the sound of musical instruments. |
| Document type | Chapter |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76398-4_15 |
| Downloads |
978-3-031-76398-4_15
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |