Moral Expressions in 280 Characters or Less An Analysis of Politician Tweets Following the 2016 Brexit Referendum Vote

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 01-07-2021
Journal Frontiers in Big Data
Article number 699653
Volume | Issue number 4
Number of pages 13
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract

Ideas about morality are deeply entrenched into political opinions. This article examines the online communication of British parliamentarians from May 2017-December 2019, following the 2016 referendum that resulted in Britain's exit (Brexit) from the European Union. It aims to uncover how British parliamentarians use moral foundations to discuss the Brexit withdrawal agreement on Twitter, using Moral Foundations Theory as a classification basis for their tweets. It is found that the majority of Brexit related tweets contain elements of moral reasoning, especially relating to the foundations of Authority and Loyalty. There are common underlying foundations between parties, but parties express opposing viewpoints within a single foundation. The study provides useful insights into Twitter’s use as an arena for moral argumentation, as well as uncovers the politician’s uses of moral arguments during Brexit agreement negotiations on Twitter. It contributes to the limited body of work focusing on the moral arguments made by politicians through Twitter.

Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.699653
Downloads
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back