Drie visies op de relatie tussen religie en veiligheidsbeleid: verslag van de expertmeeting 'Angst voor religie?' van de Commissie Religie in het Publieke Domein, 23 juni 2010, Den Haag

Authors
Publication date 2011
Journal Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid
Volume | Issue number 2 | 2
Pages (from-to) 81-94
Number of pages 14
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR)
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR)
Abstract
Which role do religious beliefs and practices play in radicalization processes of individuals and groups? In the Netherlands, the authorities are not entitled to interfere in religious content, given this content does not undermine democratic order. On the other hand religious orthodoxy is increasingly perceived as a source for violence and coercion in public discourse. Former minister of Justice Ernst Hirsch Ballin argued for a better understanding for the value of religion in society. ICCT-director Peter Knoope explained how the government can enable the development of counternarratives to violent jihadism within the civil society. James Kennedy criticised the fact that religion is increasingly problematized and politicized and argued for a more reluctant and relaxed view on religious radicalization.


Document type Article
Language Dutch
Published at http://www.bjutijdschriften.nl/tijdschrift/religierechtenbeleid/2011/2/TvRRB_1879-7784_2011_002_002_008.pdf
Permalink to this page
Back