Conversations on transnational surrogacy and the ECtHR case Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others c. Iceland (2021)
| Authors |
|
|---|---|
| Publication date | 27-06-2021 |
| Publisher | Conflict of Laws.net |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
The case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland brings to the attention of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) the no longer new, yet persistently complex, question of the determination of legal parenthood following international surrogacy arrangements. Similar to previous cases, such as Mennesson v France, Labassee v France, and Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy, this complaint originated from the refusal of national authorities to recognise the parent-child relationship established in accordance with foreign law on the ground that surrogacy is prohibited under national law. Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others is the first case of this kind involving a married same-sex couple who subsequently divorced. Like the applicants in the case of Paradiso and Campanelli v Italy, Ms Valdís Glódís Fjölnisdóttir and Ms Eydís Rós Glódís Agnarsdóttir are not biologically linked to their child, who was born in California.
|
| Document type | Web publication or website |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://conflictoflaws.net/2021/conversations-on-transnational-surrogacy-and-the-ecthr-case-valdis-fjolnisdottir-and-others-v-iceland-2021/ |
| Downloads |
mpdf
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |