Counterfactual processing and the correspondence between events and outcomes: Normality vs. value

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 1992
Journal European Journal of Social Psychology
Volume | Issue number 22
Pages (from-to) 387-396
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract Examined whether people psychologically "undo" (imagine how things may have turned out otherwise in a particular situation) events along the lines of normality or along the lines of value when these strategies conflict. 60 undergraduates were given a scenario to read and asked to write down a possible event or events that would have resulted in a different outcome. Ss were, on average, almost 4 times more likely to undo outcomes on the basis of value than normality. This tendency did not significantly differ across normal and exceptional or positive and negative outcomes.
Document type Article
Published at https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420220407
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back