The securitization of the EU’s digital tech regulation
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2023 |
| Journal | Journal of European Public Policy |
| Volume | Issue number | 30 | 7 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1431-1446 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Regulation is a prominent tool in what Kruck and Weiss call the Regulatory Security State. Safeguarding security entails shaping tech companies’ behaviour through arms-length rules, rather than wielding state capacity directly–a power shift away from state actors. As I argue, this dynamic also works in reverse: securitization of digital technology imposes security provision–a traditional state rationale–on regulatory domains hitherto dominated by commercial motivations. There is not only more regulation in security; there also is more security in regulation. This dynamic challenges the EU’s global regulatory entanglements. I use budding EU regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) to illustrate this struggle: do AI’s military implications weigh so heavily that its regulation should largely be seen through that lens? And should a transatlantic security alliance trump EU ambitions to craft its own AI governance approach? This fight is undecided yet. But given AI’s general-purpose character, its outcome will reverberate throughout society at large. |
| Document type | Article |
| Note | Published in special issue: The Regulatory Security State in Europe. |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2171090 |
| Other links | https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147269524 |
| Downloads |
The securitization of the EU s digital tech regulation
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
