The securitization of the EU’s digital tech regulation

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 2023
Journal Journal of European Public Policy
Volume | Issue number 30 | 7
Pages (from-to) 1431-1446
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR)
Abstract

Regulation is a prominent tool in what Kruck and Weiss call the Regulatory Security State. Safeguarding security entails shaping tech companies’ behaviour through arms-length rules, rather than wielding state capacity directly–a power shift away from state actors. As I argue, this dynamic also works in reverse: securitization of digital technology imposes security provision–a traditional state rationale–on regulatory domains hitherto dominated by commercial motivations. There is not only more regulation in security; there also is more security in regulation. This dynamic challenges the EU’s global regulatory entanglements. I use budding EU regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) to illustrate this struggle: do AI’s military implications weigh so heavily that its regulation should largely be seen through that lens? And should a transatlantic security alliance trump EU ambitions to craft its own AI governance approach? This fight is undecided yet. But given AI’s general-purpose character, its outcome will reverberate throughout society at large.

Document type Article
Note Published in special issue: The Regulatory Security State in Europe.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2171090
Other links https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147269524
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back