On Hierarchical Propositions
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 02-2020 |
| Journal | Journal of Philosophical Logic |
| Volume | Issue number | 49 | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-11 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | There is an apparent dilemma for hierarchical accounts of propositions, raised by Bruno Whittle (Journal of Philosophical Logic, 46, 215–231, 2017): either such accounts do not offer adequate treatment of connectives and quantifiers, or they eviscerate the logic. I discuss what a plausible hierarchical conception of propositions might amount to, and show that on that conception, Whittle’s dilemma is not compelling. Thus, there are good reasons why proponents of hierarchical accounts of propositions (such as Russell, Church, or Kaplan) did not see the difficulty Whittle raises. |
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09509-9 |
| Downloads |
On Hierarchical Propositions
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |