Booking.com deve risarcire i danni da prenotazione di una struttura fantasma. Violazione degli obblighi del mediatore, irresponsabilità del service provider, or something in between?
Commento a Trib. Modena, sentenza, 5 ottobre 2021
| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
12-2022
|
| Journal |
Pactum
|
| Volume | Issue number |
2022 | 4
|
| Pages (from-to) |
591-606
|
| Number of pages |
19
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Law (FdR) - Centre for the Study of European Contract Law (CSECL)
|
| Abstract |
Having ascertained its jurisdiction and the applicability of Italian law, the Modena District Court orders Booking.com to compensate the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages suffered by the plaintiffs for booking a “ghost structure”. The comment highlights the problems of attributing to the online platform “the obligations relating to the mediation contract”, without discussing the safe harbour established by Dir. 31/2000, as a way of translating the damage “at all costs”.
|
| Document type |
Case note
|
| Language |
Italian
|
|
Permalink to this page
|
Back
