Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 07-2023
Journal Review of Economics and Statistics
Volume | Issue number 105 | 4
Pages (from-to) 818–832
Number of pages 45
Organisations
  • Interfacultary Research - Amsterdam Center for Law & Economics (ACLE)
  • Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB)
  • Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB) - Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute (ASE-RI)
Abstract
Despite decades of research on heuristics and biases, evidence on the effect of large incentives on cognitive biases is scant. We test the effect of incentives on four widely documented biases: base-rate neglect, anchoring, failure of contingent thinking, and intuitive reasoning. In laboratory experiments with 1,236 college students in Nairobi, we implement three incentive levels: no incentives, standard lab payments, and very high incentives. We find that very high stakes increase response times by 40% but improve performance only very mildly or not at all. In none of the tasks do very high stakes come close to debiasing participants.
Document type Article
Note With supplementary file
Language English
Related dataset Replication data for: Cognitive Biases: Mistakes or Missing Stakes?
Published at https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01093 https://doi.org/10.3386/w28650
Downloads
rest_a_01093 (Final published version)
w28650 (Other version)
Permalink to this page
Back