Multidimensional evaluation of voice outcomes following total laryngectomy: a prospective multicenter cohort study

Open Access
Authors
  • C.E. Palme
  • D. Novakovic
  • D. Stone
  • L. Natsis
  • E. Charters
  • K. Jones
  • R. Dirven
  • M.W.M. van den Brekel ORCID logo
Publication date 04-2021
Journal European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Volume | Issue number 278 | 4
Pages (from-to) 1209–1222
Number of pages 14
Organisations
  • Faculty of Dentistry (ACTA)
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR)
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to assess the general course of acoustic, patient rated, and clinician-rated voice outcomes from pre- up to 12 months post total laryngectomy.

Methods
Patients admitted to a total laryngectomy in five participating hospitals in Australia and The Netherlands were included. Assessments took place at pre-, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. Voice outcomes are evaluated with the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), perceptual scales, and patient-reported outcome measures including VHI-10 and EQ-5D-5L. Statistical analyses include descriptive statistics, t tests (pre- to 6 months post-surgery), Linear Mixed Effect models.

Results
The study included 43 participants. A significant worsening of AVQI is seen from pre- to post-surgery evaluated with t test (p < 0.001). The Linear Mixed Effect model confirmed Time as a significant factor in predicting AVQI score (p ≤ 0.001), as well as perceptual rated voice quality by the clinician (p = 0.015) and patient-reported perceptual rated voice quality (p = 0.002). No statistical significance was found in VHI-10 scores over time.

Conclusion
Successful TE-speech was achieved in most participants, some had to rely on augmentative alternative communication methods. Patient-reported outcomes indicate acceptance of the condition and sufficient coping in the long term. However, acoustic rated voice quality is abnormal at all post-surgery time-points. AVQI proved to be a useful instrument to evaluate TE-speech. There is a need for validation and determination of cut-off values for VHI-10 and AVQI for use in TE-speech.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06216-z
Downloads
Permalink to this page
Back