The pragma-dialectical view of comparison argumentation
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2020 |
| Host editors |
|
| Book title | Reason to Dissent |
| Book subtitle | Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation |
| ISBN |
|
| Series | Studies in Logic. Logic and Argumentation |
| Event | 3rd European Conference on Argumentation |
| Volume | Issue number | II |
| Pages (from-to) | 261-274 |
| Publisher | London: College Publications |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | The pragma-dialectical typology of argument schemes consists of three main categories: symptomatic argumentation, comparison argumentation and causal argumentation. The subcategories and variants of these main categories have not yet been distinguished systematically. In this contribution the authors start doing so by distinguishing the most important subtypes and variants of comparison argumentation. They argue that two distinct subtypes of comparison argumentation need to be distinguished: descriptive comparison argumentation and normative comparison argumentation. |
| Document type | Conference contribution |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00013 |
| Downloads |
The pragma-dialectical view of comparison argumentation
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |