Dishonest helping and harming after (un)fair treatment

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 07-2019
Journal Judgment and Decision Making
Volume | Issue number 14 | 4
Pages (from-to) 423–439
Number of pages 17
Organisations
  • Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB) - Amsterdam School of Economics Research Institute (ASE-RI)
  • Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB)
Abstract
People experience fair and unfair treatment daily, and at times may react by breaking ethical rules and lying. Here, we assess the extent to which individuals engage in dishonest behavior aimed at helping or harming others after they experience (un) fair treatment. Across three financially incentivized experiments, recipients in a dictator game received a fair or unfair amount and then could, by means of dishonesty, inflate or deflate their counterparts’ pay. Results show that dishonest helping is a common and robust behavior. Individuals lie to help others after fair, unfair, and no prior treatment. Dishonest harming, however, is less prevalent. Only after unfair treatment, some, but not all, individuals engage in dishonest harming. Dishonest harming was associated with high levels of anger and disappointment, and low levels of gratitude. Interestingly, the source of (un) fairness, whether it is intentional or not, did not attenuate peoples’ behavior, suggesting that dishonest reactions to (un) fairness were driven by the mere (un) fair treatment, and not by a motivation to reciprocate an (un) fair counterpart.
Document type Article
Note H2020 European Research Council. Grant Number: ERC‐StG‐ 637915. - With supplementary file.
Language English
Published at http://journal.sjdm.org/19/190419/jdm190419.html
Downloads
jdm190419 (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back