Measurement of functional adequacy in different learning contexts Rationale, key issues, and future perspectives

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 06-2022
Journal TASK : Journal on Task-Based Language Teaching and Learning
Volume | Issue number 2 | 1
Pages (from-to) 8-32
Number of pages 25
Organisations
  • Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
Abstract
Linguistic performance elicited by language tasks has generally been operationalized in terms of complexity, accuracy, and fluency (CAF). However, this study argues that assessment of L2 proficiency is impossible without taking into account the adequacy and efficacy of L2 performance. To that end, we developed a rating scale for measuring functional adequacy (FA). In order to investigate the validity, reliability, and applicability of the rating scale, a number of studies are reviewed in which FA was assessed by both expert and non-expert raters, in different learning contexts, for L2 and L1, involving various source and target languages, proficiency levels, task types and modalities. We discuss perspectives and challenges for the use of the FA rating scale, particularly with regard to task-based language assessment (TBLA).
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00013.kui
Downloads
task.00013.kui (Final published version)
Permalink to this page
Back