Critical analysis of the current treatment guidelines for complex ptsd in adults

Authors
  • C.W. Lee
  • C.M. Monson
  • E.B. Foa
  • K. Wheeler
  • E. ten Broeke
  • N. Feeny
  • S.A.M. Rauch
  • K.M. Chard
  • K.T. Mueser
  • D.M. Sloan
  • M. van der Gaag
  • B.O. Rothbaum
  • F. Neuner
  • C. de Roos
  • L.M.J. Hehenkamp
  • R. Rosner
  • I.A.E. Bicanic
Publication date 2016
Journal Depression and Anxiety
Volume | Issue number 33 | 5
Pages (from-to) 359-369
Organisations
  • Faculty of Dentistry (ACTA)
Abstract
According to current treatment guidelines for Complex PTSD (cPTSD), psychotherapy for adults with cPTSD should start with a “stabilization phase.” This phase, focusing on teaching self-regulation strategies, was designed to ensure that an individual would be better able to tolerate trauma-focused treatment. The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate the research underlying these treatment guidelines for cPTSD, and to specifically address the question as to whether a phase-based approach is needed. As reviewed in this paper, the research supporting the need for phase-based treatment for individuals with cPTSD is methodologically limited. Further, there is no rigorous research to support the views that: (1) a phase-based approach is necessary for positive treatment outcomes for adults with cPTSD, (2) front-line trauma-focused treatments have unacceptable risks or that adults with cPTSD do not respond to them, and (3) adults with cPTSD profit significantly more from trauma-focused treatments when preceded by a stabilization phase. The current treatment guidelines for cPTSD may therefore be too conservative, risking that patients are denied or delayed in receiving conventional evidence-based treatments from which they might profit.
Document type Article
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1002/da.22469
Permalink to this page
Back