Investment dispute settlement à la carte within a multilateral institution: A path forward for the UNCITRAL process?
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 25-03-2019 |
| Series | Columbia FDI Perspectives, 248 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Publisher | New York: Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | Divergent models for investment dispute settlement risk producing legal fragmentation. To prevent this, states should consider a Multilateral Institution for Dispute Settlement on Investment (MIDSI) permitting dispute settlement 'à la carte'. Within MIDSI, a Multilateral Investment Court could settle investor-state disputes on an opt-in basis and serve other systemic functions. |
| Document type | Report |
| Note | Reprinted with permission from the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (www.ccsi.columbia.edu). |
| Language | English |
| Published at | http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2018/10/No-248-Schill-and-Vidigal-FINAL.pdf |
| Other links | http://ccsi.columbia.edu/publications/columbia-fdi-perspectives/ |
| Downloads |
No-248-Schill-and-Vidigal-FINAL
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
