Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2007 |
| Journal | Organization |
| Volume | Issue number | 14 | 5 |
| Pages (from-to) | 667-684 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
In the field of global rule-setting for responsible business
behaviour, multi-stakeholder standards have emerged in recent years because of their potential for effective consensus-building, knowledgesharing and interest representation. Proponents also hold that multistakeholder standards could address problems related to other forms of global rule-setting for business. Despite alleged advantages, however, analyses of multi-stakeholder initiatives, considering benefits and drawbacks, have been lacking. This article examines multi-stakeholder standards compared to other collaborative standards adopted in the past decade, and focuses subsequently on the peculiarities of multi-stakeholder standards regarding participation, governance and implementation. Multistakeholder standards, which involve business and NGOs, and sometimes also governments, are more specifi c and well-elaborated than other types of standards. But monitoring and implementation are rarely used as means for increasing participation from multiple stakeholders, including most notably those from developing countries. The article also discusses the implications of the current lack of specifi city of the (multi-)stakeholder concept and suggests refi nement of multi-stakeholder standards in terms of narrow versus broad inclusiveness. Key words. business; codes of conduct; corporate responsibility standards; corporate social responsibility; global governance; international organizations; NGOs; stakeholders |
| Document type | Article |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407080305 |
| Published at | http://org.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/14/5/667 |
| Downloads |
post-print
(Accepted author manuscript)
|
| Permalink to this page | |