Response to open peer commentaries of Hulstijn’s (2024) update of BLC Theory
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2025 |
| Journal | Languages |
| Volume | Issue number | 10 | 5 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract | In this article, I respond to six peer commentaries of my essay in Languages 2024, containing an update of BLC Theory. I address the following issues: embedding BLC Theory in more than one metatheory; the match between the theory and usage-based models; the importance of processing pressures; the distinction between BLC and ELC; the study of heritage languages; the roles of cognitive factors in L1 and L2 attainment. |
| Document type | Comment/Letter to the editor |
| Language | English |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.3390/languages10050111 |
| Downloads |
languages-10-00111(1)
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |