Coke’s Prohibitions del Roy in a European Perspective
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 06-2022 |
| Journal | Comparative Legal History |
| Volume | Issue number | 10 | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 33-51 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
Edward Coke’s Prohibitions del Roy (1608) at first sight seems a
typically English discourse: a common law judge arguing for the
independence of the common law courts from his king and from the
conciliar courts and civil law jurists. A closer look from a European
position reveals another picture, however. Compared with discussions by
his (near) contemporaries Fernando Vázquez de Menchaca, Jean Bodin, and
Hugo de Groot, it turns out that Coke’s plea fits neatly in a
Europe-wide process resulting from growing tension between iurisdictio and imperium
and between the traditional and voluntarist approaches of the state and
public power, as well as an increase in public functions, that
necessitated a sharp distinction between the judicature and the
administration. Both in theory and practice new balances had to be
found. This article focusses on the theory.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Note | Expanded version of: G. van Nifterik (2019) Rechterlijke onafhankelijkheid in de vroegmoderne tijd: enige vergelijkingen naar aanleiding van een observatie door Kees Cappon. In: De Achterkant van Minerva: Opstellen aangeboden aan prof. Kees Cappon ter gelegenheid van zijn afscheid van de Universiteit van Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid, p. 102-114. |
| Language | English |
| Related publication | Rechterlijke onafhankelijkheid in de vroegmoderne tijd |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.1080/2049677X.2022.2063517 |
| Downloads |
Coke s Prohibitions del Roy in a European perspective
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |