Reviewing High Politics. A Methodology for the Justiciability of EU-US Legal Relations

Authors
Publication date 2012
Series Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance working paper series, 2012-01
Number of pages 37
Publisher Amsterdam: Amsterdam Centre for European Law and Governance, University of Amsterdam
Organisations
  • Faculty of Law (FdR) - Amsterdam Center for European Law and Governance (ACELG)
Abstract
Despite the waning political importance of the European Union (EU) to the US, transatlantic legal relations are increasing in number in recent times. The Court of Justice has had limited opportunities to review this ‘high politics’. The case of EU-US relations potentially raises an extraordinary range of jurisdictional, constitutional and theoretical questions. The objectives of EU-US legal relations are expressly dominated by State-security concerns. A noteworthy feature of EU-US laws governing the data transfer of citizens is the explicit statement of justiciability therein, a constitutional expression for the application of the rule of law. Yet the concept of justiciability or a political question doctrine is embryonic in EU Law. The present analysis explores the concept of justiciability in EU law using three casestudies of EU-US relations. The application of explicit justiciability principles to EU-US relations is advocated here as a methodological tool for the judicial review of EU-US relations.
Document type Working paper
Note March 2012. - Amsterdam Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-60. - Postnational Rulemaking Working Paper No. 2012-03
Language English
Published at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2065374
Permalink to this page
Back