Searching for Contract (Law) in Europe
| Authors | |
|---|---|
| Publication date | 2022 |
| Journal | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy |
| Volume | Issue number | 51 | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 48-57 |
| Organisations |
|
| Abstract |
While investigating ways to Justifying Contract in Europe,
Martijn Hesselink leaves it to the interrogated theories to define the
scope of its very inquiry – the reach and significance of contract
itself. This leaves the question of what Hesselink sets out to justify
quite open for the reader, who at the same time gets the distinctive
idea that this delimitation has normative significance in the author’s
own views. To the extent that we do, as a matter of justice, need to
have contract law rules – then, these rules need to be just. The
comment, thus, seeks to re-articulate Hesselink’s non-definition of
(European) contract law, to try to delimit where we need such
rules and test the boundaries of what rules we may in fact accept or
even need as a matter of justice – what kind of rules we can, in
Hesselink’s framework, ultimately set out to justify.
|
| Document type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Related publication | How Radical is the Understanding of Democracy in <i>Justifying Contract in Europe</i>? |
| Published at | https://doi.org/10.5553/NJLP/221307132022051001008 |
| Downloads |
Searching_for_Contract_Law_in_Europe
(Final published version)
|
| Permalink to this page | |
