| Authors |
|
| Publication date |
2018
|
| Host editors |
|
| Book title |
Argumentation and Inference
|
| Book subtitle |
Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Argumentation
|
| ISBN |
|
| Series |
Studies in logic
|
| Event |
2nd European Conference on Argumentation
|
| Volume | Issue number |
I
|
| Pages (from-to) |
573-588
|
| Publisher |
London: College Publications
|
| Organisations |
-
Faculty of Humanities (FGw) - Amsterdam Institute for Humanities Research (AIHR) - Amsterdam Center for Language and Communication (ACLC)
|
| Abstract |
The Periodic Table of Arguments is based on a grammatical
understanding of categorical statements. A commentator has
pointed out that taking a logical understanding of such
statements would render one of the distinctions constituting
the theoretical framework of the table unwarranted. In this
paper, it is examined how arguments based on syllogistic
inferences are represented in the table by comparing the
theoretical framework of the Periodic Table of Arguments to
that of Aristotle’s assertoric syllogistic.
|
| Document type |
Conference contribution
|
| Language |
English
|
| Other links |
http://collegepublications.co.uk/logic/sla/?00010
|
|
Permalink to this page
|
