Efficacy of imagery rescripting in treating mental disorders associated with aversive memories An updated meta-analysis

Open Access
Authors
Publication date 10-2023
Journal Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Article number 102772
Volume | Issue number 99
Number of pages 11
Organisations
  • Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences (FMG) - Psychology Research Institute (PsyRes)
Abstract

Imagery rescripting (ImRs) is frequently applied to treat different psychological complaints. We conducted an updated meta-analysis based on randomised controlled trials on the efficacy of ImRs for mental disorders associated with aversive memories. Medline, PsycInfo, and Web of Science were searched up to May 2023. Seventeen trials were included with a total of 908 participants (417 in the ImRs condition), suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, depression, or eating disorders. Random effect models yielded an overall effect of g = 0.68 (95 % CI 0.18 to 1.18; k = 7) compared to passive controls (mostly waitlist). The effect compared to (prolonged) exposure, cognitive restructuring, and EMDR was non-significant (g = −0.01; 95 % CI −0.18 to 0.15; k = 11). Follow-up assessments indicated a long-term treatment effect. Results suggest that ImRs can effectively treat a variety of psychological disorders and produce similar treatment effects as evidence-based interventions. Limitations include the bounded number of included trials for each mental disorder. The meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020220696) and received no funding.

Document type Review article
Note With supplementary files. - Corrigendum published in: Journal of Anxiety Disorders (2025) 115:103071.
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102772
Other links https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2025.103071 https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85171644759
Downloads
1-s2.0-S088761852300110X-main (Final published version)
Supplementary materials
Permalink to this page
Back