Possibilities for Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage in Brazil

Authors
  • M. Rogieri Pelissari
  • S. Gomes Relva
  • D. Peyerl
Publication date 2023
Host editors
  • D. Peyerl
  • S. Relva
  • V. Da Silva
Book title Energy transition in Brazil
ISBN
  • 9783031210327
ISBN (electronic)
  • 9783031210334
Series The Latin American Studies Book Series
Chapter 9
Pages (from-to) 141-157
Publisher Cham: Springer
Organisations
  • Faculty of Science (FNWI) - Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences (HIMS)
Abstract
Carbon Capture, Usage and Storage (CCUS) alternatives have great relevance for the decarbonization path of the energy transition and for the international goal of net-zero emissions. The concept is related to the capture of CO2 from stationary sources, treatment, transportation, utilization, and/or permanent storage. These low-carbon technologies can help Brazil reduce carbon emissions, mainly in the energy and industry sectors. Thus, the present chapter provides an overview of CCUS and BECCUS technologies and discusses the current scenario and future perspectives for their development in Brazil. For this, we analysed recent publications about CCUS and Bioenergy-CCUS (BECCUS) regarding the stages of capture, transport, usage and storage in Brazil, and we also systematized the technology specificities amongst CCUS and BECCUS. Some of the main results are the huge potential for associating BECCUS, considering Brazil's large production of biofuels, mainly bioethanol from sugarcane, and the advantages of capturing CO2 from fermentation processes. The enhanced oil recovery, production of soft drinks, urea and methanol industries, and low-carbon hydrogen production are listed as some of the main possibilities for using the captured CO2. Also, the ParanĂ¡ and Santos Sedimentary Basins were considered the most prospective for carbon storage, as they are located near large-scale CO2 emission sources and have geologic favourability. Some of the main challenges observed for projects developments in Brazil are (i) the absence of a regulatory framework; (ii) the lack of public policies and financial incentives to leverage the commercial feasibility of CCUS projects; (iii) the assessment absence of water availability without compromising its multiple uses; (iv) the absence of an integrated pipeline grid to transport CO2; and (v) the need of a more mature characterization of sedimentary basins for CO2 storage and long-term behaviour to guarantee safe sequestration.
Document type Chapter
Language English
Published at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21033-4_9
Permalink to this page
Back